Jumping on a more worthwhile bandwagon.

[ssurgul]

Marriage is love.

Comments

[huscoon.livejournal.com]

So, what do you think about the idea of legalizing 3-person, or heck, even 4-person marriages?

[ssurgul.livejournal.com]

As long as there is a clear-cut, directed understanding of expectations, and that all parties involved are mature, responsible, and understanding, as well as agreeable to the notion, I don't see a problem with it at all. Love is not always monogamous. And while I dislike the notion that the Moron community, at large, had put forth about it (1 man, as many wives as he wanted, to ensure his seed survived), I also dislike the social stigma that's grown around marriage in general. If a woman wants two husbands, and they get along with each other, then who cares? The illusion of a standard form of marriage, perpetrated and reinforced by legislation like the Defense of Marriage Act, is beyond anything resembling a farce. But then, our society was originally formed by those who couldn't survive in Europe because their own religious views were too absurd for the commoner there.

[huscoon.livejournal.com]

*nods and smiles*

So long as you are consistant. :)

You're off the hot seat. ^_^

[ssurgul.livejournal.com]

*laughs!* Oh, um, thanks then. :)

Re:

[icaruspony.livejournal.com]

The divorce attorneys would make a fortune!

Re:

[ssurgul.livejournal.com]

Sad, but true. But then, I'm also all for removing the vast majority of litigation outstanding on the court systems nowadays anyway. Justice, in this country, is still hit-and-miss, and very, very arbitrary. But the overloads on the courts because of Stubbed-Toe-Means-$14Million lawsuits and other frivolous crap. Even more than half the divorce things going on.

Re:

[huscoon.livejournal.com]

That's one way to think about it :)