The problem I have with "news" sites like that is; Unless I'm willing to track down some corroborating evidence on my own, how can I just blindly take that report as fact?
If it is true though......I can't say I'm surprised.
Well, I think there's a deeper problem here. And that's the nature of news and reporting in this country, and most likely globally.
Something like this will spring up on the AP newswire, and several sources will tap that same originating source, with and without crediting it to said. Therefore, even with corraboration of other sites, that doesn't really do much other than respew the same facts. Of course, that doesn't preclude the secondary source doing their own followup for proof and reassurance to the readership, but still.
"The U.S. Constitution was not available on site for comment, but expressed in a written statement support for “the freedom of speech” and “of the press” among other civil liberties," a Democratic news release said.
Would it be exceptionally bitter or sad if I say that if Bush is re-elected it would be no major issue?
He will be out in 4 years, by law.
And if he makes errors - even more than he is already (it seems) - the religious / self-righteous population who put him there will have no choice but to realize the error of their ways. It is the only way to enlighten those who have the blinders of "faith".
It is rather distasteful but I have enough skills, in a large variety of jobs descriptions, that I (believe) I can survive a poor economy. If others wish to run this situation into the ground I believe I can "sit back" and wait for the fallout.
Yes, that may seem quite hateful. But Americans often end up with the exact government they so richly deserve.
no subject
on 2004-Oct-18, Monday 05:43 pm (UTC)If it is true though......I can't say I'm surprised.
no subject
on 2004-Oct-19, Tuesday 09:52 am (UTC)Plenty of other sites reporting it.
no subject
on 2004-Oct-19, Tuesday 10:36 am (UTC)Something like this will spring up on the AP newswire, and several sources will tap that same originating source, with and without crediting it to said. Therefore, even with corraboration of other sites, that doesn't really do much other than respew the same facts. Of course, that doesn't preclude the secondary source doing their own followup for proof and reassurance to the readership, but still.
no subject
on 2004-Oct-20, Wednesday 04:41 am (UTC)I just hope things work out for ya'll down there.
no subject
on 2004-Oct-18, Monday 05:45 pm (UTC)Fucking OWNED.
no subject
on 2004-Oct-18, Monday 06:14 pm (UTC)<b>Bitter</b>, Super-Size it
on 2004-Oct-18, Monday 07:01 pm (UTC)He will be out in 4 years, by law.
And if he makes errors - even more than he is already (it seems) - the religious / self-righteous population who put him there will have no choice but to realize the error of their ways. It is the only way to enlighten those who have the blinders of "faith".
It is rather distasteful but I have enough skills, in a large variety of jobs descriptions, that I (believe) I can survive a poor economy. If others wish to run this situation into the ground I believe I can "sit back" and wait for the fallout.
Yes, that may seem quite hateful. But Americans often end up with the exact government they so richly deserve.
The stupid fucks.